2020-08-02 22:22:19 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
KWin - the KDE window manager
|
|
|
|
This file is part of the KDE project.
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-02 22:22:19 +00:00
|
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2007 Philip Falkner <philip.falkner@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2009 Martin Gräßlin <mgraesslin@kde.org>
|
|
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2010 Alexandre Pereira <pereira.alex@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2018 Vlad Zahorodnii <vlad.zahorodnii@kde.org>
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-02 22:22:19 +00:00
|
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
// own
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "glide.h"
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-12 18:31:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// KConfigSkeleton
|
|
|
|
#include "glideconfig.h"
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
// Qt
|
|
|
|
#include <QMatrix4x4>
|
2018-06-01 10:17:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <QSet>
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace KWin
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-01 10:17:43 +00:00
|
|
|
static const QSet<QString> s_blacklist {
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
QStringLiteral("ksmserver ksmserver"),
|
2018-08-14 16:38:10 +00:00
|
|
|
QStringLiteral("ksmserver-logout-greeter ksmserver-logout-greeter"),
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
QStringLiteral("ksplashqml ksplashqml"),
|
|
|
|
QStringLiteral("ksplashsimple ksplashsimple"),
|
|
|
|
QStringLiteral("ksplashx ksplashx")
|
2018-06-01 10:17:43 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
GlideEffect::GlideEffect()
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-12-02 19:27:43 +00:00
|
|
|
initConfig<GlideConfig>();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
reconfigure(ReconfigureAll);
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
connect(effects, &EffectsHandler::windowAdded, this, &GlideEffect::windowAdded);
|
|
|
|
connect(effects, &EffectsHandler::windowClosed, this, &GlideEffect::windowClosed);
|
|
|
|
connect(effects, &EffectsHandler::windowDeleted, this, &GlideEffect::windowDeleted);
|
|
|
|
connect(effects, &EffectsHandler::windowDataChanged, this, &GlideEffect::windowDataChanged);
|
2011-11-22 21:35:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-07 14:36:41 +00:00
|
|
|
GlideEffect::~GlideEffect() = default;
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::reconfigure(ReconfigureFlags flags)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Q_UNUSED(flags)
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-25 15:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
GlideConfig::self()->read();
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
m_duration = std::chrono::milliseconds(animationTime<GlideConfig>(160));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.edge = static_cast<RotationEdge>(GlideConfig::inRotationEdge());
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.angle.from = GlideConfig::inRotationAngle();
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.angle.to = 0.0;
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.distance.from = GlideConfig::inDistance();
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.distance.to = 0.0;
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.opacity.from = GlideConfig::inOpacity();
|
|
|
|
m_inParams.opacity.to = 1.0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.edge = static_cast<RotationEdge>(GlideConfig::outRotationEdge());
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.angle.from = 0.0;
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.angle.to = GlideConfig::outRotationAngle();
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.distance.from = 0.0;
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.distance.to = GlideConfig::outDistance();
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.opacity.from = 1.0;
|
|
|
|
m_outParams.opacity.to = GlideConfig::outOpacity();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::prePaintScreen(ScreenPrePaintData &data, std::chrono::milliseconds presentTime)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
auto animationIt = m_animations.begin();
|
|
|
|
while (animationIt != m_animations.end()) {
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
std::chrono::milliseconds delta = std::chrono::milliseconds::zero();
|
|
|
|
if (animationIt->lastPresentTime.count()) {
|
|
|
|
delta = presentTime - animationIt->lastPresentTime;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
animationIt->lastPresentTime = presentTime;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*animationIt).timeLine.update(delta);
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
++animationIt;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data.mask |= PAINT_SCREEN_WITH_TRANSFORMED_WINDOWS;
|
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
effects->prePaintScreen(data, presentTime);
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::prePaintWindow(EffectWindow *w, WindowPrePaintData &data, std::chrono::milliseconds presentTime)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (m_animations.contains(w)) {
|
2010-11-02 20:33:54 +00:00
|
|
|
data.setTransformed();
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
w->enablePainting(EffectWindow::PAINT_DISABLED_BY_DELETE);
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
effects->prePaintWindow(w, data, presentTime);
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::paintWindow(EffectWindow *w, int mask, QRegion region, WindowPaintData &data)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
auto animationIt = m_animations.constFind(w);
|
|
|
|
if (animationIt == m_animations.constEnd()) {
|
|
|
|
effects->paintWindow(w, mask, region, data);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Perspective projection distorts objects near edges
|
|
|
|
// of the viewport. This is critical because distortions
|
|
|
|
// near edges of the viewport are not desired with this effect.
|
|
|
|
// To fix this, the center of the window will be moved to the origin,
|
|
|
|
// after applying perspective projection, the center is moved back
|
|
|
|
// to its "original" projected position. Overall, this is how the window
|
|
|
|
// will be transformed:
|
|
|
|
// [move to the origin] -> [rotate] -> [translate] ->
|
|
|
|
// -> [perspective projection] -> [reverse "move to the origin"]
|
|
|
|
const QMatrix4x4 oldProjMatrix = data.screenProjectionMatrix();
|
|
|
|
const QRectF windowGeo = w->geometry();
|
|
|
|
const QVector3D invOffset = oldProjMatrix.map(QVector3D(windowGeo.center()));
|
|
|
|
QMatrix4x4 invOffsetMatrix;
|
|
|
|
invOffsetMatrix.translate(invOffset.x(), invOffset.y());
|
|
|
|
data.setProjectionMatrix(invOffsetMatrix * oldProjMatrix);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Move the center of the window to the origin.
|
|
|
|
const QRectF screenGeo = effects->virtualScreenGeometry();
|
|
|
|
const QPointF offset = screenGeo.center() - windowGeo.center();
|
|
|
|
data.translate(offset.x(), offset.y());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const GlideParams params = w->isDeleted() ? m_outParams : m_inParams;
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
const qreal t = (*animationIt).timeLine.value();
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (params.edge) {
|
|
|
|
case RotationEdge::Top:
|
2012-06-02 19:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
data.setRotationAxis(Qt::XAxis);
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
data.setRotationOrigin(QVector3D(0, 0, 0));
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAngle(-interpolate(params.angle.from, params.angle.to, t));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case RotationEdge::Right:
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAxis(Qt::YAxis);
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationOrigin(QVector3D(w->width(), 0, 0));
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAngle(-interpolate(params.angle.from, params.angle.to, t));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case RotationEdge::Bottom:
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAxis(Qt::XAxis);
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationOrigin(QVector3D(0, w->height(), 0));
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAngle(interpolate(params.angle.from, params.angle.to, t));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case RotationEdge::Left:
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAxis(Qt::YAxis);
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationOrigin(QVector3D(0, 0, 0));
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAngle(interpolate(params.angle.from, params.angle.to, t));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
// Fallback to Top.
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAxis(Qt::XAxis);
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationOrigin(QVector3D(0, 0, 0));
|
|
|
|
data.setRotationAngle(-interpolate(params.angle.from, params.angle.to, t));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data.setZTranslation(-interpolate(params.distance.from, params.distance.to, t));
|
|
|
|
data.multiplyOpacity(interpolate(params.opacity.from, params.opacity.to, t));
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
effects->paintWindow(w, mask, region, data);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::postPaintScreen()
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
auto animationIt = m_animations.begin();
|
|
|
|
while (animationIt != m_animations.end()) {
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((*animationIt).timeLine.done()) {
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
EffectWindow *w = animationIt.key();
|
|
|
|
if (w->isDeleted()) {
|
|
|
|
w->unrefWindow();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
animationIt = m_animations.erase(animationIt);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
++animationIt;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effects->addRepaintFull();
|
|
|
|
effects->postPaintScreen();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GlideEffect::isActive() const
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
return !m_animations.isEmpty();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GlideEffect::supported()
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
return effects->isOpenGLCompositing()
|
|
|
|
&& effects->animationsSupported();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::windowAdded(EffectWindow *w)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (effects->activeFullScreenEffect()) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!isGlideWindow(w)) {
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!w->isVisible()) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
const void *addGrab = w->data(WindowAddedGrabRole).value<void*>();
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (addGrab && addGrab != this) {
|
2010-11-02 20:33:54 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
w->setData(WindowAddedGrabRole, QVariant::fromValue(static_cast<void*>(this)));
|
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
GlideAnimation &animation = m_animations[w];
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.reset();
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setDirection(TimeLine::Forward);
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setDuration(m_duration);
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setEasingCurve(QEasingCurve::InCurve);
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effects->addRepaintFull();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::windowClosed(EffectWindow *w)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (effects->activeFullScreenEffect()) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!isGlideWindow(w)) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!w->isVisible()) {
|
2010-11-02 20:33:54 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
const void *closeGrab = w->data(WindowClosedGrabRole).value<void*>();
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (closeGrab && closeGrab != this) {
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
w->refWindow();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
w->setData(WindowClosedGrabRole, QVariant::fromValue(static_cast<void*>(this)));
|
|
|
|
|
Provide expected presentation time to effects
Effects are given the interval between two consecutive frames. The main
flaw of this approach is that if the Compositor transitions from the idle
state to "active" state, i.e. when there is something to repaint,
effects may see a very large interval between the last painted frame and
the current. In order to address this issue, the Scene invalidates the
timer that is used to measure time between consecutive frames before the
Compositor is about to become idle.
While this works perfectly fine with Xinerama-style rendering, with per
screen rendering, determining whether the compositor is about to idle is
rather a tedious task mostly because a single output can't be used for
the test.
Furthermore, since the Compositor schedules pointless repaints just to
ensure that it's idle, it might take several attempts to figure out
whether the scene timer must be invalidated if you use (true) per screen
rendering.
Ideally, all effects should use a timeline helper that is aware of the
underlying render loop and its timings. However, this option is off the
table because it will involve a lot of work to implement it.
Alternative and much simpler option is to pass the expected presentation
time to effects rather than time between consecutive frames. This means
that effects are responsible for determining how much animation timelines
have to be advanced. Typically, an effect would have to store the
presentation timestamp provided in either prePaint{Screen,Window} and
use it in the subsequent prePaint{Screen,Window} call to estimate the
amount of time passed between the next and the last frames.
Unfortunately, this is an API incompatible change. However, it shouldn't
take a lot of work to port third-party binary effects, which don't use the
AnimationEffect class, to the new API. On the bright side, we no longer
need to be concerned about the Compositor getting idle.
We do still try to determine whether the Compositor is about to idle,
primarily, because the OpenGL render backend swaps buffers on present,
but that will change with the ongoing compositing timing rework.
2020-11-20 15:44:04 +00:00
|
|
|
GlideAnimation &animation = m_animations[w];
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.reset();
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setDirection(TimeLine::Forward);
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setDuration(m_duration);
|
|
|
|
animation.timeLine.setEasingCurve(QEasingCurve::OutCurve);
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
effects->addRepaintFull();
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-11 18:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::windowDeleted(EffectWindow *w)
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
m_animations.remove(w);
|
2011-01-30 14:34:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-03-14 21:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void GlideEffect::windowDataChanged(EffectWindow *w, int role)
|
2011-08-27 09:21:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (role != WindowAddedGrabRole && role != WindowClosedGrabRole) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-08-27 09:21:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (w->data(role).value<void*>() == this) {
|
2016-11-07 14:36:41 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto animationIt = m_animations.find(w);
|
|
|
|
if (animationIt == m_animations.end()) {
|
2016-11-07 14:36:41 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (w->isDeleted() && role == WindowClosedGrabRole) {
|
|
|
|
w->unrefWindow();
|
2016-11-07 14:36:41 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
m_animations.erase(animationIt);
|
2011-03-14 21:50:05 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GlideEffect::isGlideWindow(EffectWindow *w) const
|
2011-03-29 09:15:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
[effects/glide] Don't animate the Application Dashboard
Summary:
The Glide effect should not animate the Application Dashboard because
it's not an ordinary application or a dialog. Same applies to Kickoff,
panel popups, etc.
The most obvious solution would be to add "plasmashell plasmashell"
window class to the blacklist, but we still would like to animate some
of plasmashell's windows, for example, Empty Trash Bin confirmation
dialog (if the trash bin icon is on the desktop).
One could notice that the Empty Trash Bin confirmation dialog, Task
Manager Settings window, and other plasmashell's windows that we want
to animate have decorations. So, we can use that as a heuristic.
Test Plan: Opened/closed the Application Dashboard.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, abetts, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D14367
2018-07-25 07:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
// We don't want to animate most of plasmashell's windows, yet, some
|
|
|
|
// of them we want to, for example, Task Manager Settings window.
|
|
|
|
// The problem is that all those window share single window class.
|
|
|
|
// So, the only way to decide whether a window should be animated is
|
|
|
|
// to use a heuristic: if a window has decoration, then it's most
|
|
|
|
// likely a dialog or a settings window so we have to animate it.
|
2018-10-17 13:00:58 +00:00
|
|
|
if (w->windowClass() == QLatin1String("plasmashell plasmashell")
|
|
|
|
|| w->windowClass() == QLatin1String("plasmashell org.kde.plasmashell")) {
|
[effects/glide] Don't animate the Application Dashboard
Summary:
The Glide effect should not animate the Application Dashboard because
it's not an ordinary application or a dialog. Same applies to Kickoff,
panel popups, etc.
The most obvious solution would be to add "plasmashell plasmashell"
window class to the blacklist, but we still would like to animate some
of plasmashell's windows, for example, Empty Trash Bin confirmation
dialog (if the trash bin icon is on the desktop).
One could notice that the Empty Trash Bin confirmation dialog, Task
Manager Settings window, and other plasmashell's windows that we want
to animate have decorations. So, we can use that as a heuristic.
Test Plan: Opened/closed the Application Dashboard.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, abetts, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D14367
2018-07-25 07:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
return w->hasDecoration();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (s_blacklist.contains(w->windowClass())) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (w->hasDecoration()) {
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Make Scale and Glide effects Wayland-friendly
Summary:
The Scale effect and the Glide effect have to animate only ordinary
windows(i.e. the ones that are considered to be apps).
On X11, in order to distinguish ordinary windows from combo box popups,
popup menus, and other popups, those effects check whether given window
is managed.
On Wayland, there is no concept of managed/unmanaged windows.
XDG Shell protocol defines 2 surface roles:
* xdg_toplevel;
* and, xdg_popup.
The former can be used to implement typical windows, the ones that can
be minimized, maximized, etc.
The latter can be used to implement tooltips, popup menus, etc. Thus,
that's a good criteria to filter popup windows.
CCBUG: 398100
Reviewers: #kwin, graesslin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, graesslin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D15117
2018-10-08 18:08:13 +00:00
|
|
|
// Don't animate combobox popups, tooltips, popup menus, etc.
|
|
|
|
if (w->isPopupWindow()) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-26 17:48:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Don't animate the outline because it looks very sick.
|
2019-03-19 14:01:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (w->isOutline()) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Make Scale and Glide effects Wayland-friendly
Summary:
The Scale effect and the Glide effect have to animate only ordinary
windows(i.e. the ones that are considered to be apps).
On X11, in order to distinguish ordinary windows from combo box popups,
popup menus, and other popups, those effects check whether given window
is managed.
On Wayland, there is no concept of managed/unmanaged windows.
XDG Shell protocol defines 2 surface roles:
* xdg_toplevel;
* and, xdg_popup.
The former can be used to implement typical windows, the ones that can
be minimized, maximized, etc.
The latter can be used to implement tooltips, popup menus, etc. Thus,
that's a good criteria to filter popup windows.
CCBUG: 398100
Reviewers: #kwin, graesslin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, graesslin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D15117
2018-10-08 18:08:13 +00:00
|
|
|
// Override-redirect windows are usually used for user interface
|
|
|
|
// concepts that are not expected to be animated by this effect.
|
|
|
|
if (w->isX11Client() && !w->isManaged()) {
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return w->isNormalWindow()
|
|
|
|
|| w->isDialog();
|
2011-03-29 09:15:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[effects] Rewrite the Glide effect
Summary:
There are several reasons why I "re-wrote" the Glide effect:
* it doesn't work correctly because it suffers from undesired perspective distortions: {F5914378}
The worst part is that windows are distorted so much on multiple monitor setups that it's hard to say whether that's glide animation.
* window close animation is not quite intuitive: if the close button is
located at the top and I click it, I would expect that window is
rotated around the bottom edge, not the top; (IMHO)
* it's too much distracting when working on something for quite good
amount of time: e.g. when editing photos, which involves a big number
of different dialogs;
* there are issues with deletion of QTimeLine;
* windows are not gracefully released if some other effect grabs them;
* its code doesn't follow common coding style in KWin.
So, the "new" Glide effect is more subtle, it's possible to have
different rotation edges for window open/close animations, it doesn't
animate special windows(like audio volume feedback), the code is simpler
and readable. Yet, there are some issues with QTimeLine, which are
common to all effects in KWin anyway.
### Demos
{F5889803}
//Window Open Animation//
{F5889804}
//Window Close Animation//
{F5889805, layout=center, size=full}
//KCM//
CCBUG: 394245
Test Plan:
* Enabled the Glide effect
* Closed System Settings
* Opened it again
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Subscribers: ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D13338
2018-06-01 09:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
} // namespace KWin
|