a protocol to activate the blur behind windows and to
optionally set a sub region of the window where to apply
the blur to, in case the window is shaped
REVIEW:125015
The shadow protocol is inspired by the KWin's X11 protocol and the
DecorationShadow in KDecoration2.
A shadow is attached to a surface (after a commit on surface) and
consists of several image parts (represented through a buffer):
* top-left
* top
* top-right
* right
* bottom-right
* bottom
* bottom-left
* left
In addition there is an offset on each side.
For more information see also the X11 protocol described at [1].
Note: the protocol is currently missing documentation and changing
the shadow is not yet properly delegated to the server API.
[1] https://community.kde.org/KWin/Shadow
Now the code handles correctly the attaching of a null buffer
(emits a signal unmapped) and if a commit doesn't have a pending
buffer it won't be reset. Damage requests are ignored if no buffer
has been attached yet.
Required information is passed through the ctor of Private.
::create is still virtual as ShellSurfaceInterface is retrieving
client information. This can be fixed once we have a better wl_client
encapsulation class.
The Resource base class is supposed to be used by all interface
classes which get created for a wl_resource.
Most interface classes are adjusted, but there are some exceptions:
* BufferInterface: is different as the wl_resource is already created
* PointerInterface and KeyboardInterface: those two need changes, the
implementation differs from all other interface implementations.
This implements the subcompositor and subsurface protocol on both
Client and Server side.
Client:
New classes SubCompositor and SubSurface. The SubCompositor can be
created through the Registry and creates the SubSurface which is
bound to a Surface and has a parent Surface. The SubSurface class
provides convenient wrappers for all calls exposed in the
wl_subsurface interface.
Server:
New classes SubCompositorInterface and SubSurfaceInterface. Support
for all commands is added, though the API probably still can need
some fine tuning. The synchronized vs. desynchronized behavior is
not yet exposed in the API. This could also be delegated towards
the user of the library.
