We use the PMF syntax so the isValid() check is unnecessary as the
compiler will notify about wrong signal at compile time. It makes
writing autotests feel less boilerplaty.
Things such as Output, InputDevice and so on are made to be
multi-purpose. In order to make this separation more clear, this change
moves that code in the core directory. Some things still link to the
abstraction level above (kwin), they can be tackled in future refactors.
Ideally code in core/ should depend either on other code in core/ or
system libs.
[5/6] Make autotests create fake input devices
Migrate all input simulation functions from kwinApp()->platform()->...
to the their counter part in the Test namespace.
Currently, if a window switches between SSD and CSD, it is possible to
encounter a "corrupted" state where the server-side decoration is wrapped
around the window while it still has the client-side decoration.
The xdg-decoration protocol fixes this problem by saying that decoration
updates are bound to xdg_surface configure events.
At the moment, kwin sort of applies decoration updates immediately. With
this change, decoration updates will be done according to the spec.
If the compositor wants to create a decoration, it will send a configure
event and apply the decoration when the configure event is acked by the
client. In order to send the configure event with a good window geometry
size, kwin will create the decoration to query the border size but not
assign it to the client yet. As is, KDecoration api doesn't make
querying the border size ahead of time easy. The decoration plugin can
assign arbitrary border sizes to windows as it pleases it. We could change
that, but it effectively means starting KDecoration3 and setting existing
window deco ecosystem around kwin on fire the second time, that's off the
table.
If the compositor wants to remove the decoration, it will send a
configure event. When the configure event is acked and the surface is
committed, the window decoration will be destroyed.
Sync'ing decoration updates to configure events ensures that we cannot
end up with having both client-side and server-side decoration. It also
helps us to fix a bunch of geometry related issues caused by creating
and destroying the decoration without any surface buffer attached yet.
BUG: 445259
The main motivation behind this change is to prepare kwin for importing
kwayland-server code in libkwin.
As is, builtin effects are linked with libkwin. Some builtin effects
have wayland specific code. If we move wayland stuff in libkwin, there's
going to be a circular dependency between kwin4_effect_builtins and
libkwin targets.
This change intends to break that dependency by linking builtin effects
to kwin executable.
The main issue with that is that EffectLoader would need to discover the
effects indirectly. QStaticPlugin is used for that purpose.
Besides breaking the cyclic dependency, it makes builtin effects use the
same plugin infrastructure in libkwineffects that external effects use.
Metadata in src/effects/effect_builtins.cpp was converted in a list of
python dictionaries, which was fed to a python script that generated
main.cpp and metadata.json files.
With a "Surface" type in kwin, KWayland::Client::Surface without fully
specified namespace will conflict with kwin's Surface type.
In some way, it also improves readability as it's clear where Surface
comes from.
When debugging modifier_only_shortcut_test in _waylandonly mode I saw
that it was failing, among other things, because some aspects were not
initialised.
This changes every test we have to run the new
Test::initWaylandWorkspace() that calls waylandServer()->initWorkspace()
but also makes sure that WaylandServer::initialized is emitted before we
proceed.
The main advantage of SPDX license identifiers over the traditional
license headers is that it's more difficult to overlook inappropriate
licenses for kwin, for example GPL 3. We also don't have to copy a
lot of boilerplate text.
In order to create this change, I ran licensedigger -r -c from the
toplevel source directory.
The new signal is emitted when the Application has fully been initialized.
It allows us to change the startup sequence, for example create workspace
before starting the Xwayland server, without making any adjustments in our
test suit.
Summary:
Currently, we have only one shell client type - XdgShellClient. We use
it when we are dealing with Wayland clients. But it isn't really a good
idea because we may need to support shell surfaces other than xdg-shell
ones, for example input panel surfaces.
In order to make kwin more extensible, this change replaces all usages
of the XdgShellClient class with the AbstractClient class.
Test Plan: Existing tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27778
Summary:
Rename ShellClient to XdgShellClient in order to reflect that it
represents only xdg-shell clients.
Test Plan: Compiles, tests still pass.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D23589
Summary:
So far wayland was used by internal clients to submit raster buffers
and position themselves on the screen. While we didn't have issues with
submitting raster buffers, there were some problems with positioning
task switchers. Mostly, because we had effectively two paths that may
alter geometry.
A better approach to deal with internal clients is to let our QPA use
kwin core api directly. This way we can eliminate unnecessary roundtrips
as well make geometry handling much easier and comprehensible.
The last missing piece is shadows. Both Plasma::Dialog and Breeze widget
style use platform-specific APIs to set and unset shadows. We need to
add shadows API to KWindowSystem. Even though some internal clients lack
drop-shadows at the moment, I don't consider it to be a blocker. We can
add shadows back later on.
CCBUG: 386304
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Maniphest Tasks: T9600
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22810
Summary:
The new test is similar to testToplevelOpenCloseAnimation. The
main purpose of this test is to verify that the Fading Popups effect
animates all sorts of popups, e.g. popup menus, tooltips, etc.
testAnimateUserActionsPopup is skipped for now because stuff
that animates unmapped clients is broken.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D17992
