Summary:
So far we were following a bit unique and rare doxygen comment style:
/**
* Contents of the comment.
**/
Doxygen comments with this style look balanced and neat, but many people
that contribute to KWin don't follow this style. Instead, they prefer
more traditional doxygen comment style, i.e.
/**
* Contents of the comment.
*/
Reviewing such changes has been a bit frustrating for me (so selfish!)
and for other contributors.
This change switches doxygen comment style in KWin to a more traditional
style. The main reason for doing this is to make code review process easier
for new contributors as well us.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22812
Summary:
EffectsModel has to communicate with KWin in order to receive the
actual value of SupportedRole. So, in theory the model should notify
about loaded effects after receiving response from KWin, but that's
not the case.
Test Plan: Desktop Effects KCM no longer flashes when resetting changes.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D18728
Summary:
If an effect is installed or removed, then all not yet committed changes
will be lost. This is undesired behaviour.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D18705
Summary:
The main motivation for adding this method is to avoid code duplication.
Both virtual desktops kcm and desktop effects kcm have their own logic
to create configuration dialogs for effects.
On the bright side, if we add support for declarative effect kcms, we
will need to change only this method.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D18704
Summary:
A while ago desktop effects and compositing settings lived under the
same roof
{F6584639}
{F6584642}
but time has passed and now those two have their own kcms. This causes
some issues:
* for newcomers it's harder to find code of the Desktop Effects KCM;
* git history doesn't look good, e.g. "[kcmkwin/compositing] Add some
bugs to Desktop Effects KCM to fix later";
* in general, the mix of two doesn't look good in the code.
This change splits out the Desktop Effects KCM. Unfortunately, in order
to have more nicer code I had to refactor EffectModel a little bit.
Before:
{F6584669}
After:
{F6587570}
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, ltoscano, mart, ngraham, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D18703
Summary:
The main motivation for moving it into a shared library is to share the
model between Desktop Effects and Virtual Desktops KCM.
The extracted model is quite the same as the one in Desktop Effects KCM,
except some minor changes, e.g. rename loadEffect and syncConfig to more
convenient names, add comments, some whitespace changes, fix coding
style in some parts, etc.
Test Plan: effectModelTest passes, Desktop Effects KCM works.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: hein, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D17765
