In most cases, we don't need to react to client geometry changes, but in
code that deals with server-side window decorations, we need to react to
client geometry changes. The problem is that frame and client geometry
updates are not correlated even though there is a connection between the
frame geometry and the client geometry.
This change introduces the client geometry in the Toplevel class in order
to allow monitoring client geometry updates from DecoratedClientImpl.
Summary:
Prefer virtual methods that take QRect and QSize rather than multi-int versions.
Makes for clearer API and reduces the amount of code that was taking all of the
components and turn it into a class.
Reviewers: #kwin, zzag
Reviewed By: #kwin, zzag
Subscribers: zzag, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D28283
Summary:
We have duplicated code in InternalClient and XdgShellClient to create
decorations. In order to get rid of the code duplication, this change
introduces a method that AbstractClient subclasses can call to create
a window decoration.
Test Plan: Tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, apol
Reviewed By: apol
Subscribers: apol, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27822
Summary:
Currently, there are a couple of issues with sizeForClientSize(). First
of all, we have a method called clientSizeToFrameSize() which does similar
thing except applying geometry constraints and checking window rules. The
other issue is that sizeForClientSize() is doing a bit too much, it checks
window rules, it applies a bunch of geometry constrains. Sometimes it
does not perform conversion between client sizes and frame sizes!
This change attempts to address those issues by replacing sizeForClientSize
with two similar methods and changing semantics of some methods of the
X11Client class.
The most significant difference between sizeForClientSize() and the new
methods is that neither constrainClientSize() nor constrainFrameSize()
check window rules. This is up to users of those methods. In many places,
we don't have to check window rules because we check isResizable(),
which returns false if the frame size is enforced by a window rule.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D26828
Summary:
Not all Client classes have support for the maximized mode. Therefore,
it can be made opt-in to reduce the amount of plumbed methods.
Unfortunately, there a few places, which don't have any connection with
the maximized mode, where AbstractClient::geometryRestore() is used, so
it cannot be made 100% optional at the moment.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27169
Summary:
In long term, we want to split XdgShellClient into several classes. One
class for xdg-toplevel clients, and the other one for xdg-popup clients.
xdg-popup clients are much simpler than xdg-toplevel clients, they can't
be maximized or shown in full screen mode, they can't be interactively
moved on the screen, and so on. In the end, we will have to plumb many
pure virtual methods, which looks a bit ugly.
This change makes support for the minimized state in AbstractClient
optional so we don't have to add those no-op methods and keep code more
or less "clean."
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27163
Summary:
In long term, we want to split XdgShellClient into several classes. One
class for xdg-toplevel clients, and the other one for xdg-popup clients.
xdg-popup clients are much simpler than xdg-toplevel clients, they can't
be maximized or shown in full screen mode, they can't be interactively
moved on the screen, and so on. In the end, we will have to plumb many
pure virtual methods, which looks a bit ugly.
This change makes support for full screen mode in AbstractClient optional
so we don't have to add those no-op methods and keep code more or less
"clean."
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27162
Summary:
Currently we have two signals that are emitted when the Toplevel's geometry
changes - geometryShapeChanged() and geometryChanged(). The former signal
is used primarily to invalidate cached window quads and the latter is
sort of emitted when the frame geometry changes. But it's not that easy. We
have a bunch of connects that link those signals together...
The worst part about all of this is that the window quads cache gets
invalidated every time a geometry update occurs, for example when user
moves a window around on the screen.
This change introduces a new signal and deprecates the existing geometryChanged
signal. frameGeometryChanged is similar to geometryChanged except that it is
emitted when an _actual_ geometry change has occurred.
We do still emit geometryShapeChanged signal. However, in long term, we
need to get rid of this signal or come up with something that makes sense
and doesn't require us to waste computational resources.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D26863
Summary: The new name better reflects what Toplevel::geom is.
Test Plan: Compiles, tests still pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D25738
Summary:
Rename geometryBeforeUpdateBlocking in order to better reflect that it
corresponds to the last frame geometry.
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24658
Summary:
So far the window geometry from xdg-shell wasn't implemented as it should
be. A toplevel must have two geometries assigned to it - frame and buffer.
The frame geometry describes bounds of the client excluding server-side
and client-side drop-shadows. The buffer geometry specifies rectangle on
the screen occupied by the main surface.
State and geometry handling in XdgShellClient is still a bit broken. This
change doesn't intend to fix that, it must be done in another patch asap.
Test Plan: New tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Maniphest Tasks: T10867
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24455
Summary:
In order to properly implement xdg_surface.set_window_geometry we need
two kinds of geometry - frame and buffer. The frame geometry specifies
visible bounds of the client on the screen, excluding client-side drop
shadows. The buffer geometry specifies rectangle on the screen that the
attached buffer or x11 pixmap occupies on the screen.
This change renames the geometry property to frameGeometry in order to
reflect the new meaning assigned to it as well to make it easier to
differentiate between frame geometry and buffer geometry in the future.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24334
Summary: getShadow is not a getter method as it doesn't return a shadow.
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24298
Summary:
So far wayland was used by internal clients to submit raster buffers
and position themselves on the screen. While we didn't have issues with
submitting raster buffers, there were some problems with positioning
task switchers. Mostly, because we had effectively two paths that may
alter geometry.
A better approach to deal with internal clients is to let our QPA use
kwin core api directly. This way we can eliminate unnecessary roundtrips
as well make geometry handling much easier and comprehensible.
The last missing piece is shadows. Both Plasma::Dialog and Breeze widget
style use platform-specific APIs to set and unset shadows. We need to
add shadows API to KWindowSystem. Even though some internal clients lack
drop-shadows at the moment, I don't consider it to be a blocker. We can
add shadows back later on.
CCBUG: 386304
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Maniphest Tasks: T9600
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22810
Summary:
There are rules that have to be applied only once, e.g. every Remember
and Apply Initially rule, as well rules that need to configure the client,
e.g. size, etc. In the best scenario the compositor would evaluate such
rules when the client is about to be mapped.
This change limits window rules only to xdg-shell clients because right
now only this protocol lets compositors to intervene in the client
initialization process. Also, it makes things a bit easier for us on the
compositor side.
xdg-shell protocol satisfies most of ours requirements to implement window
rules, but not all of them. If the client is about to be mapped for the
second time and its size is forced by a rule, then compositor may need
to configure it. Currently, xdg-shell protocol doesn't have any mechanism
that a client could use to notify the compositor about its intent to map.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: fmonteiro, davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D19411
Summary:
Given that our QPA now creates native offscreen surfaces, we no longer
need the QOffscreenSurface guard introduced by 61956025f.
Reviewers: #kwin, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22198
Summary:
Unfortunately Aurorae decoration engine creates several internal clients
per each decoration. One of those clients represents QOffscreenSurface,
which is not a toplevel. Given that no QWindow object will be found for
such clients, m_internalWindowFlags contains undefined value.
Luckily, QOffscreenSurface sets FramelessWindowHint flag, but because
InternalClient is not able to find matching QWindow object, cached
QWindow flags won't have that hint set.
Thus InternalClient will attempt to decorate QOffscreenSurface. A new
Aurorae decoration will be created, which means a new QOffscreenSurface
will be created, which means a new Aurorae decoration will be created,
and so on.
This change restricts subset of internal clients that can be decorated.
Only clients with valid m_internalWindow can be decorated. If m_internalWindow
isn't null, then m_internalWindowFlags is guaranteed to be valid as well.
BUG: 407612
FIXED-IN: 5.16.3
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22136
Summary:
Window open/close animation effects should not animate the outline
because the end result is a bit awkward.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D19886
Summary:
Most of the functionality which is special to internal clients is moved
from ShellClient to InternalClient. As KWin's qpa is still bound to the
Wayland protocol InternalClient inherits from ShellClient. Due to that
some aspects in ShellClient are "weird". ShellClient still detects
whether it's an internal client and uses the variable m_internal to
capture the state. This is required as we cannot use the isInternal
method. Most of m_internal usage is in init which is called from
constructor of ShellClient. Thus it's not possible to call into virtual
methods of InternalClient.
Also some of the code is duplicated and some methods are temporarily
marked as virtual.
The next step will be to remove ShmBuffer for internal windows which
should decouple the two implementations further with the long term goal
of having InternalClient inherit AbstractClient directly.
Test Plan:
Run nested KWin, triggered outline (OpenGL case) and debug console (shm case).
InternalWindow unit test still passes.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D18569
