Summary:
Xwayland clients are sometimes offset from being visible to having a
surface applied.
We might also have internal windows which will be AbstractClients
without a surface.
No idle interface will be set up for non wayland clients, but on a
desktop change we itterate through all AbstractClients and need to guard
somewhere.
BUG: 420039
Test Plan: None
Reviewers: #kwin, apol
Reviewed By: apol
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D28858
Summary:
Currently, we have only one shell client type - XdgShellClient. We use
it when we are dealing with Wayland clients. But it isn't really a good
idea because we may need to support shell surfaces other than xdg-shell
ones, for example input panel surfaces.
In order to make kwin more extensible, this change replaces all usages
of the XdgShellClient class with the AbstractClient class.
Test Plan: Existing tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27778
Summary:
Rename ShellClient to XdgShellClient in order to reflect that it
represents only xdg-shell clients.
Test Plan: Compiles, tests still pass.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D23589
Summary:
So far wayland was used by internal clients to submit raster buffers
and position themselves on the screen. While we didn't have issues with
submitting raster buffers, there were some problems with positioning
task switchers. Mostly, because we had effectively two paths that may
alter geometry.
A better approach to deal with internal clients is to let our QPA use
kwin core api directly. This way we can eliminate unnecessary roundtrips
as well make geometry handling much easier and comprehensible.
The last missing piece is shadows. Both Plasma::Dialog and Breeze widget
style use platform-specific APIs to set and unset shadows. We need to
add shadows API to KWindowSystem. Even though some internal clients lack
drop-shadows at the moment, I don't consider it to be a blocker. We can
add shadows back later on.
CCBUG: 386304
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Maniphest Tasks: T9600
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D22810
Summary:
Currently, our implementation of zwp_idle_inhibitor_v1 is not fully
spec-compliant. If the associated surface is not visible, we still
honor the idle inhibitor object.
This change addresses those spec-compliance issues. If a surface is
minimized or it's not on the current virtual desktop, then the
associated inhibitor object won't be honored by KWin.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: graesslin, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D17343
Summary:
Some applications are not able to inhibit the idle behavior because
each of them creates an inhibitor object before the corresponding
ShellClient object becomes ready for painting.
BUG: 401499
FIXED-IN: 5.15.0
Test Plan: idle-inhibit client (from wlroots/examples) works.
Reviewers: #kwin, graesslin
Reviewed By: #kwin, graesslin
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D17227
Summary:
A small helper class is added which manages inhibiting idle for the
ShellClients. So far only very basic functionality is added. That is
only the inhibition on the Surface is followed. It is not yet checked
whether the ShellClient is visible at all. That needs some changes in
ShellClient.
BUG: 385956
FIXED-IN: 5.12
Test Plan: New test case passes
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D8856
