Other policy enums are declared in options.h so let's do the same for
placement policy. Besides consistency, another advantage of moving the
enum in kwin namespace is that the enum could be forward declared.
An application that does not support text-input has no way of
communicating with the input method, so even if you show the input
method the application receives nothing. As a fallback, instead send
fake key events so the application still gets something at least.
The key events are synthesised based on the text string that the
input method sends, which may result in things that do not actually
correspond to real keys. Unfortunately I do not see a way around that.
CCBUG: 439911
Currently, the main user of these two functions is the X11 standalone
platform.
This change ports that code to Workspace::geometry(), which is not great
but the X11 backend already depends on the Workspace indirectly via the
Screens. Not sure if it's worth making the standalone X11 backend track
the xinerama rect internally.
Since the screen number is well-known, we can look up the default
screen on demand. Note that xcb_get_setup() is pretty cheap as it
simply returns a const pointer to pre-allocated data.
At the moment, a platform should provide two output lists - one that
lists all available outputs, and the other one that contains only
enabled outputs. In general, this amounts to some boilerplate code and
forces backends to be implemented in some certain way, which sometimes
is inconvenient, e.g. if an output is disabled or enabled, it will be
simpler if we only change Output::isEnabled(), otherwise we need to
start accounting for corner cases such as the order in which
Output::isEnabled() and Platform::enabledOutputs() are changed, etc.
The Session can be useful not only to the platform backend but also
input backends and for things such as vt switching, etc. Therefore it's
better to have the Application own the Session.
Platform backends are provided as plugins. This is great for
extensibility, but the disadvantages of this design outweigh the
benefits.
The number of backends will be limited, it's safe to say that we will
have to maintain three backends for many years to come - kms/drm,
virtual, and wayland. The plugin system adds unnecessary complexity.
Startup logic is affected too. At the moment, platform backends provide
the session object, which is awkward as it starts adding dependencies
between backends. It will be nicer if the session is created depending
on the loaded session type.
In some cases, wayland code needs to talk to the backend directly, e.g.
for drm leasing, etc. With the plugin architecture it's hard to do that.
Not impossible though, we can approach it as in Qt 6, but it's still
harder than linking the code directly.
Of course, the main disadvantage of shipping backends in a lib is that
you will need to patch kwin if you need a custom platform, however such
cases will be rare.
Despite that disadvantage, I still think that it's a step in the right
direction where the goal is to have multi-purpose backends and other
reusable components of kwin.
The legacy X11 standalone platform is linked directly to kwin_x11
executable, while the remaining backends are linked to libkwin.
The original intention behind creating plugins before the workspace was
to handle the case where kwin_wayland may need to wait until outputs are
available. However, since things have changed a lot in that regard,
plugins can be loaded after the workspace now.
The main benefit behind this is that plugins can be simpler, they won't
need to track when the workspace is created.
On X11, plugins are already loaded after the workspace is instantiated.
This change adjusts the window management abstractions in kwin for the
drm backend providing more than just "desktop" outputs.
Besides that, it has other potential benefits - for example, the
Workspace could start managing allocation of the placeholder output by
itself, thus leading to some simplifications in the drm backend. Another
is that it lets us move wayland code from the drm backend.
We gain nothing with it. XCB setup logic in the Xwayland server has to
be moved to the workspace layer anyway. For example, this move of
responsibilities will be needed to support running more than just one
instance of Xwayland. Architecture-wise, it would be cleaner too.
Unfortunately, it breaks encapsulation of the Application, but this can
be taken care later.
With fractional scaling integer based logical geometry may not match
device pixels. Once we have a floating point base we can fix that. This
also is
important for our X11 scale override, with a scale of 2 we could
get logical sizes with halves.
We already have all input being floating point, this doubles down on it
for all remaining geometry.
- Outputs remain integer to ensure that any screen on the right remains
aligned.
- Placement also remains integer based for now.
- Repainting is untouched as we always expand outwards
(QRectF::toAdjustedRect().
- Decoration is untouched for now
- Rules are integer in the config, but floating in the adjusting/API
This should also be fine.
At some point we'll add a method to snap to the device pixel
grid. Effectively `round(value * dpr) / dpr` though right now things
mostly work.
This also gets rid of a lot of hacks for QRect right and bottom which
are very
confusing.
Parts to watch out in the port are:
QRectF::contains now includes edges
QRectF::right and bottom are now sane so previous hacks have to be
removed
QRectF(QPoint, QPoint) behaves differently for the same reason
QRectF::center too
In test results some adjusted values which are the result of
QRect.center because using QRectF's center should behave the same to the
user.
The Screens object is created by Workspace on X11. This change makes X11
and Wayland behave more similar. As is, the Screens is a helper for
window management code, don't use it in backends. Note that the X11 backend
already uses the Screens, it needs to be addressed individually.
We don't really care about the window showing up until we're calling
showInputPanel, but since Workspace::windowAdded is triggered for any
window that gets added, the test sometimes fails because count() is 2
instead of 1. To avoid that, only create the spy when it's actually
relevant instead of all the way at the start before any other setup is
done.
The IdleDetector is an idle detection helper. Its purpose is to reduce
code duplication in our private KIdleTime plugin and the idle wayland
protocol, and make user activity simulation less error prone.
Firstly we weren't waiting for a signal at all, we are relying on events
being processed externally which is wrong.
Secondly ScreenLocker::KSldApp::self()->lockState() is tri-state;
unlocked, acquiring, locked. This gets compressed to a boolean where
acquiring and locked are the same.
If we run the tests whilst we're still acquiring the lock screen we can
call unlocked before we've finished locking. The greeter might then be
shown afterwards triggering a re-lock. It's a confused state.
