Summary:
Unlike the other cases this one is not as dangerous as the shadow
protocol doesn't have a destructor request (yet).
Once that is added the problem would be the same: destroying the
ShadowInterface when the parent SurfaceInterface gets destroyed would
result in a protocol error on client side.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1711
Summary:
Destroying the ServerSideDecorationInterface on the server side before
the client has a chance to cleanup results in a protocol error:
wl_display@1: error 0: invalid object 7
Which would terminate the client. If we would not destroy the resource,
but only delete the ServerSideDecorationInterface it could result in
heap-use-after-free.
So just don't do anything, the client needs to cleanup which will result
in the ServerSideDecorationInterface being deleted.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1710
Summary:
Destroying the ContrastInterface on the server side before the client has
a chance to cleanup results in a protocol error:
wl_display@1: error 0: invalid object 7
Which would terminate the client. If we would not destroy the resource,
but only delete the ContrastInterface it could result in
heap-use-after-free.
So just don't do anything, the client needs to cleanup which will result
in the ContrastInterface being deleted.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1709
Summary:
Destroying the BlurInterface on the server side before the client has a
chance to cleanup results in a protocol error:
wl_display@1: error 0: invalid object 7
Which would terminate the client. If we would not destroy the resource,
but only delete the BlurInterface it could result in heap-use-after-free.
So just don't do anything, the client needs to cleanup which will result
in the BlurInterface being deleted.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1708
We saw it fail on build.kde.org a few times and it looks like a
entered spy gets triggered timing dependent (no surprise it's on
client side). So better check whether the entered spy got delivered
already and if not wait for the event.
Summary:
This change standardizes the behavior regarding the destructor request.
The destructor should destroy the resource and nothing else. The
Wayland library invokes the static unbind method once the resource is
destroyed. The implementation provided by Resource::Private::unbind
triggers a delete later on the Resource. So there is no need to trigger
a deleteLater from the destructor request callback.
This change adds a generic implementation to Resource::Private which is
now used by all inheriting classes replacing the custom implementations.
Test Plan:
For a few Resources the test is extended to ensure that the Resource
gets deleted on server side.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1679
Summary:
Not needed as the dtor of the Resource ensures that the wl_resource
gets destroyed.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1680
The text input change creates an additional serial, so the check
for last generated serial on the Display fails. The test is now
adjusted to the new semantics. A more reliable way would be to
verify the serial on the SeatInterface, though.
Summary:
This change introduces support for text input. Text input allows to
compose text on the server (e.g. through a virtual keyboard) and sent
the composed text to the client.
There are multiple interfaces for text input. QtWayland 5.6 uses
wl_text_input, QtWayland 5.7 uses zwp_text_input_v2.
wl_text_input is from pre Wayland-Protocols times and considered as
UnstableV0 in this implementation. The other interface is UnstableV2.
Unfortunately the V2 variant is not yet part of Wayland-Protocols, but
used in Qt.
The implementation hides the different interfaces as good as possible.
The general idea is the same, the differences are rather minor.
This means changes to how interfaces are wrapped normally. On client
side in the Registry a manager is factored which represent either of
the two interfaces. Similar on the server side Display's factory method
takes an argument to decide which interface should be factored. This
way a user of the library can expose both interfaces and thus be
compatible with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.7 onwards.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1631
Summary:
When destroying a SurfaceInterface all callbacks are getting destroyed.
This used to iterate over the callbacks and performing
wl_resource_destroy on them. This triggered the destroy handler which
removes the resource from the callback list. Which means removing from
the list we are iterating on. This could result in a double delete or
accessing invalid memory.
This change copies all callbacks to a temporary list and clears the
normal lists. So the destroy handler does no longer modify the lists
currently being iterated on.
Test Plan: Added a test case which crashed with previous code
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1677
The ShellSurface might have the resource destroyed, before being deleted,
so there is a short time frame where resource might be null.
Crash was caught by KWin.
Reviewed-By: sebas and notmart
A downstream KWin test shows a possible heap-use-after-free if we
access the wl_client pointer. Basically we get the client disconnected
just before the focused surface gets unbind. Thus for a short moment
the ClientConnection pointer is gone. This needs to be extended with
a test case, but for the moment it should be good enough to get KWin
green again.
Summary:
So far the server component performed manual cleanup in some cases
when a client disconnects. But this is not needed: the Wayland library
calls the static unbind methods which do cleanup. If we cleanup ourselves
this can result in double deletes in the worst case, so let's only use
the Wayland functionality.
Adjusted:
* RegionInterface
* SurfaceInterface
* ShellSurfaceInterface (doesn't take a parent anymore)
* DpmsInterface
* QtSurfaceExtensionInterface
* KeyboardInterface
* PointerInterface
* TouchInterface
* DataOfferInterface
* PlasmaShellSurfaceInterface
For each adjusted case a test case is added to verify that the cleanup
works. Exceptions are DpmsInterface as the actual Resource is not exposed
at all in the Server component and DataOfferInterface as that is server
side created.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1640
From time to time the test is failing on build.kde.org with an ASAN
heap-use-after-free error. From my investigation this seems to be caused
by the OutputDevice being constructed on the stack and being destroyed
while handling Wayland events, but before all are handled.
The test mostly operates on the changed signal. There is also a done
signal emitted later on. Wayland sends the done after a set of changes
is transmitted. Thus the test is adjusted to wait for done instead of
changed. So we can ensure that all events are handled before the object
gets destroyed.
I have never been able to reproduce the problem locally, so I cannot
guarantee that the issue is solved for good. If it still happens more
investigation will be needed.
Summary:
When the model gets destroyed the lambda connections were still invoked
and could cause crashers.
Test Plan: Test case added and each one verified that it crashed
Reviewers: #plasma, hein
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1624
Summary:
There is a possibility that a PlasmaWindow is unmapped when the
PlasmaWindowModel gets created. In this situation the unmapped
PlasmaWindow will be deleted in the next event cycle. So far
PlasmaWindowModel didn't handle this situation and the model might
hold deleted objects due to this.
This change addresses this potential problem and ensures the model
gets updated when a PlasmaWindow is deleted.
Test Plan: Test case which exposes the problem is added
Reviewers: #plasma, hein
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1622
Summary:
So far when the active PlasmaWindow got unmapped or destroyed, the
PlasmaWindowManagement didn't update the activeWindow. This means it
could expose a deleted object through it's API which could result in
a crash.
This change addresses the problem by updating the active window when
a window gets unmapped or destroyed.
Test Plan: Tests added which exposed the problem
Reviewers: #plasma, hein
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1621
Summary:
The protocol is extended by a dedicated destructor request. When a
PlasmaWindow is umapped we no longer destroy the resource directly,
but only send the unmap. The client is then supposed to clean up
(which it already did in that case) and will invoke the destructor.
The PlasmaWindowInterface object will be automatically deleted after
the unmap once all resources bound for it are destroyed.
The tests are extended by two new test cases which triggered protocol
errors on the client side prior to this change.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1594
Summary: To use pid_t one should include sys/types.h -- else the build fails on FreeBSD.
Reviewers: graesslin
Reviewed By: graesslin
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1579
Coverity complains (in CID 1335150) about `Generator::parseInterface()`
since the default copy-ctor for `Interface` will end up copying
uninitialized memory (the unset `m_factory` member). Fixed by
initializing the m_factory.
REVIEW:127836
Summary:
Exposes closable state in the window model and adds tests. This was
included in the protocol and interface, but missing from the model.
Test Plan: Autotest extended.
Reviewers: graesslin
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1435
Summary:
Analogous to NET::ActionChangeDesktop.
KWindowInfo::actionSupported(NET::ActionChangeDesktop) is hardcoded
to return true in kwin, but that's not how it should be; as this will
be fixed later the Wayland protocol needs this state bit as well for
parity.
Test Plan: PlasmaWindowModel test is extended.
Reviewers: graesslin
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1448
Summary:
Adds states and request methods to determine whether a window can be put into
move or resize modes, and request move and resize modes, respectively.
request* naming pre-discussed with Martin. I chose to add *Mode to be more
explicit as well as avoid namespace conflicts with possible other Move/Resize
methods in the future.
Since these are not toggleable states, there is no requestToggle* methods.
Protocol version is not bumped (also pre-discussed with Martin) since we have
pending changes already bumping to 3.
Depends on D1417.
Test Plan: PlasmaWindowModel test extended.
Reviewers: graesslin
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1432
Summary:
This adds support for 'shadable' and 'shaded' states to the protocol and
to the client and server classes, as well as the window model.
Test Plan: The PlasmaWindowModel test has been extended to test the new states.
Reviewers: graesslin
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1417
Summary:
Surface/SubSurface and Shadow handle the case that an attached buffer
gets destroyed by the client. So far we didn't have this code covered,
but it's rather important as incorrect reference counting can hit
asserts.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1403
Summary:
KWayland does not have a client implementation of the QtSurfaceExtension
protocol. Thus the test is different: it starts a helper binary which
creates a QWindow. The test closes that one which should terminate the
started applications.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1388
Summary:
Basic functionality is covered. Changing of shadow elements not covered,
there seems to be lacking server API for that - no change signal.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1398
Summary:
Now also tests:
* requesting mode from client side
* update supported change on server side
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1357
If the focused pointer and keyboard surface is the same we use pointer
clicks as a hint to which child surface should have keyboard focus.
Keyboard focus handling for sub surfaces is rather limited overall.
We just don't have a good model on how to determine which child surface
should get the keyboard focus. When passing focus to a surface there
is no way to know which of the sub-surfaces should get the focus.
Ideally the client should handle this, but that's just not the case.
The best we have is a reference through the pointer. But that's of
course also limited. Keyboard focus passed to the surface for another
reason (Alt+Tab) cannot select the proper sub-surface without interaction
from another input device.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1330
Summary:
The idea behind this change is to make the existance of sub-surfaces
an implementation detail for pointer events. The user of the library
does not need to care about on which sub-surface the pointer is on.
It only needs to care about the main surface and passes the focus to
the main surface.
Internally the PointerInterface takes care of sending the enter to
the sub-surface at the current pointer position. Also whenever the
pointer position changes, the PointerInterface evaluates whether it
triggered a change for the focused sub-surface and sends enter/leave
events accordingly. If the focused sub-surface does not change, it
sends motion events as normally, but of course under consideration
of the sub-surface position.
Overall this means that from pointer usage perspective a user of the
library doesn't need to care about the fact that there are sub-surfaces
at all. The library does the correct thing for it.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1329
Summary:
The new method returns the (child) surface at a given surface position
taking care of stacking order, whether surfaces are mapped, etc.
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1319
