SurfaceInterface::inputIsInfinite() has been dropped. If the surface has
no any input region specified, SurfaceInterface::input() will return a
region that corresponds to the rect of the surface (0, 0, width, height).
While the new design is more robust, for example it's no longer possible
to forget to check SurfaceInterface::inputIsInfinite(), it has shown some
issues in the input stack of kwin.
Currently, acceptsInput() will return false if you attempt to click the
server-side decoration for a surface whose input region is not empty.
Therefore, it's possible for an application to set an input region with
a width and a height of 1. If user doesn't know about KSysGuard or the
possibility of closing apps via the task manager, they won't be able to
close such an application.
Another issue is that if an application has specified an empty input
region on purpose, user will be still able click it. With the new
behavior of SurfaceInterface::input(), this is no longer an issue and it
is handled properly by kwin.
In order to determine if a window accepts input at specified position,
we need to check if the decorated window and the server-side decoration
contain the given point.
While we have a way to determine if a point falls inside the input shape
of the decorated window, there is no any way to do the same for the deco.
The layer-shell protocol allows wayland clients to create surfaces that
can be used for building desktop environment components such as panels,
notifications, etc.
The support for the plasma-shell protocol will be dropped once plasma in
all its entirety is ported to the layer-shell protocol.
in XdgSurfaceClient setFrameGeometry is async,
so we can't rely on it having the final value immediately.
make setVirtualKeyboardGeometry a virtual.
in the implementation on setVirtualKeyboardGeometry
use requestedFrameGeometry() instead of frameGeometry()
This change adds a default handle for screen edge based activation in
order to reduce the amount of boilerplate in client sub-classes that do
not support features such as auto-hiding, e.g. popups.
This change adds a default implementation for no border functionality
in order to reduce the amount of boilerplate code in client sub-classes
that have no support for server-side decorations.
Not all client types support server-side decorations, for example it's
typically the case for popup windows. This change provides a default
implementation for the updateDecoration() method in order to reduce the
amount of boilerplate code in client types that have no support for ssd.
Currently, we have two functions that update the color scheme for a
client - updateColorScheme(QString) and updateColorScheme(). Even though
they both share the same name, they do different things. The first one
sets the specified color scheme, while the other determines the color
scheme preferred by the client and assigns it.
This change refactors the color scheme initialization code so we no
longer need those two methods. The setColorScheme() method sets the
specified color scheme, and the preferredColorScheme() method returns
the color scheme preferred by the client. Sub-classes of AbstractClient
can override the preferredColorScheme() method in order to add support
for platform-specific color scheme protocols.
The end result: color scheme related code is a bit more comprehensible.
The main advantage of SPDX license identifiers over the traditional
license headers is that it's more difficult to overlook inappropriate
licenses for kwin, for example GPL 3. We also don't have to copy a
lot of boilerplate text.
In order to create this change, I ran licensedigger -r -c from the
toplevel source directory.
In rare cases, Workspace::restoreFocus() may fail, for example when the
most recently activated client is about to be destroyed or unmapped.
If it happens that we cannot restore the focus, then mark the window in
FocusIn event as active.
CCBUG: 424223
We may call setActive() on a window that is being deleted. We cannot
guarantee that at that moment the X11 window or the Wayland surface is
still valid. So, the best course of actions is to do nothing.
BUG: 424255
In most cases, we don't need to react to client geometry changes, but in
code that deals with server-side window decorations, we need to react to
client geometry changes. The problem is that frame and client geometry
updates are not correlated even though there is a connection between the
frame geometry and the client geometry.
This change introduces the client geometry in the Toplevel class in order
to allow monitoring client geometry updates from DecoratedClientImpl.
Summary:
This change splits the XdgShellClient class to better match existing
abstractions in the xdg-shell protocol and fix a few issues related to
sending configure events.
In the new client classes, configure events are handled differently.
Instead of blocking configure events, we try to send them as late as
possible. Delaying configure events will let us merge changeMaximize()
for X11 clients and Wayland clients and it also fixes the bug where
we don't send the final configure event when user has finished resizing
a window.
Given that configure events are not sent immediately, XdgSurfaceClient
keeps the last requested frame geometry and the last requested client
geometry.
This patch doesn't intend to fix all issues in kwin's implementation of
the xdg-shell protocol. For example, we still handle surface unmapping
very poorly.
Test Plan: Tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27861
Summary:
The geometry property has been deprecated for quite some time and its
usage in scripts is highly discouraged. Since AbstractClient overrides
the geometry property to make it writable, the same thing must be done
for the frameGeometry property.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D29666
Summary:
In order to allow shading wayland clients, this change moves core shade
code from X11Client to AbstractClient.
Test Plan: Shading still works on X11.
Reviewers: #kwin, cblack
Reviewed By: cblack
Subscribers: cblack, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D29512
Summary:
Prefer virtual methods that take QRect and QSize rather than multi-int versions.
Makes for clearer API and reduces the amount of code that was taking all of the
components and turn it into a class.
Reviewers: #kwin, zzag
Reviewed By: #kwin, zzag
Subscribers: zzag, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D28283
Summary:
We have duplicated code in InternalClient and XdgShellClient to create
decorations. In order to get rid of the code duplication, this change
introduces a method that AbstractClient subclasses can call to create
a window decoration.
Test Plan: Tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, apol
Reviewed By: apol
Subscribers: apol, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27822
Summary:
The new method provides a generic way for destructing clients. Notice
that we can't just delete clients because we may need to discard
temporary window rules, which is usually done in destroyClient().
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27821
Summary:
Currently, we have only one shell client type - XdgShellClient. We use
it when we are dealing with Wayland clients. But it isn't really a good
idea because we may need to support shell surfaces other than xdg-shell
ones, for example input panel surfaces.
In order to make kwin more extensible, this change replaces all usages
of the XdgShellClient class with the AbstractClient class.
Test Plan: Existing tests pass.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27778
Summary:
Currently, there are a couple of issues with sizeForClientSize(). First
of all, we have a method called clientSizeToFrameSize() which does similar
thing except applying geometry constraints and checking window rules. The
other issue is that sizeForClientSize() is doing a bit too much, it checks
window rules, it applies a bunch of geometry constrains. Sometimes it
does not perform conversion between client sizes and frame sizes!
This change attempts to address those issues by replacing sizeForClientSize
with two similar methods and changing semantics of some methods of the
X11Client class.
The most significant difference between sizeForClientSize() and the new
methods is that neither constrainClientSize() nor constrainFrameSize()
check window rules. This is up to users of those methods. In many places,
we don't have to check window rules because we check isResizable(),
which returns false if the frame size is enforced by a window rule.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D26828
Summary:
Not all Client classes have support for the maximized mode. Therefore,
it can be made opt-in to reduce the amount of plumbed methods.
Unfortunately, there a few places, which don't have any connection with
the maximized mode, where AbstractClient::geometryRestore() is used, so
it cannot be made 100% optional at the moment.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27169
Summary:
In long term, we want to split XdgShellClient into several classes. One
class for xdg-toplevel clients, and the other one for xdg-popup clients.
xdg-popup clients are much simpler than xdg-toplevel clients, they can't
be maximized or shown in full screen mode, they can't be interactively
moved on the screen, and so on. In the end, we will have to plumb many
pure virtual methods, which looks a bit ugly.
This change makes support for the minimized state in AbstractClient
optional so we don't have to add those no-op methods and keep code more
or less "clean."
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27163
Summary:
In long term, we want to split XdgShellClient into several classes. One
class for xdg-toplevel clients, and the other one for xdg-popup clients.
xdg-popup clients are much simpler than xdg-toplevel clients, they can't
be maximized or shown in full screen mode, they can't be interactively
moved on the screen, and so on. In the end, we will have to plumb many
pure virtual methods, which looks a bit ugly.
This change makes support for full screen mode in AbstractClient optional
so we don't have to add those no-op methods and keep code more or less
"clean."
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27162
Summary:
Currently we have two signals that are emitted when the Toplevel's geometry
changes - geometryShapeChanged() and geometryChanged(). The former signal
is used primarily to invalidate cached window quads and the latter is
sort of emitted when the frame geometry changes. But it's not that easy. We
have a bunch of connects that link those signals together...
The worst part about all of this is that the window quads cache gets
invalidated every time a geometry update occurs, for example when user
moves a window around on the screen.
This change introduces a new signal and deprecates the existing geometryChanged
signal. frameGeometryChanged is similar to geometryChanged except that it is
emitted when an _actual_ geometry change has occurred.
We do still emit geometryShapeChanged signal. However, in long term, we
need to get rid of this signal or come up with something that makes sense
and doesn't require us to waste computational resources.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D26863
Summary:
KDE is known for having a strong view on the client-side decorations vs
server-side decorations issue. The main argument raised against CSD is
that desktop will look less consistent when clients start drawing window
decorations by themselves, which is somewhat true. It all ties to how
well each toolkit is integrated with the desktop environment.
KDE doesn't control the desktop market on Linux. Another big "player"
is GNOME. Both KDE and GNOME have very polarized views on in which
direction desktop should move forward. The KDE community is pushing more
toward server-side decorations while the GNOME community is pushing
more toward client-side decorations. Both communities have developed
great applications and it's not rare to see a GNOME application being
used in KDE Plasma. The only problem is that these different views are
not left behind the curtain and our users pay the price. Resizing GTK
clients in Plasma became practically impossible due to resize borders
having small hit area.
When a client draws its window decoration, it's more likely that it also
draws the drop-shadow around the decoration. The compositor must know
the extents of the shadow so things like snapping and so on work as
expected. And here lies the problem... While the xdg-shell protocol has
a way to specify such things, the NetWM spec doesn't have anything like
that. There's _GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS in the wild, however the problem with
it is that it's a proprietary atom, which is specific only to GTK apps.
Due to that, _GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS wasn't implemented because implementing
anything like that would require major changes in how we think about
geometry.
Recent xdg-shell window geometry patches adjusted geometry abstractions
in kwin to such a degree that it's very easy to add support for client
side decorated clients on X11. We just have to make sure that the
X11Client class provides correct buffer geometry and frame geometry when
the gtk frame extents are set.
Even though the X11 code is feature frozen, I still think it's worth
to have _GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS support in kwin because it will fix the resize
issues. Also, because KWin/Wayland is unfortunately far from becoming
default, it will help us with testing some implementation bits of the
window geometry from xdg-shell.
BUG: 390550
FIXED-IN: 5.18.0
Test Plan:
Things like quick tiling, maximizing, tiling scripts and so on work as
expected with GTK clients.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: cblack, trmdi, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24660
Summary:
The stored buffer geometry can be useful for detecting whether the
buffer geometry has been changed.
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24659
Summary:
Rename geometryBeforeUpdateBlocking in order to better reflect that it
corresponds to the last frame geometry.
Test Plan: Compiles.
Reviewers: #kwin, romangg
Reviewed By: #kwin, romangg
Subscribers: kwin
Tags: #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24658
Summary:
Currently our Scene is quite naive about geometry. It assumes that the
window frame wraps the attached buffer/client. While this is true for X11
clients, such geometry model is not suitable for client-side decorated
clients, in our case for xdg-shell clients that set window geometry
other than the bounding rectangle of the main surface.
In general, the proposed solution doesn't make any concrete assumptions
about the order between frame and buffer geometry, however we may still
need to reconsider the design of Scene once it starts to generate quads
for sub-surfaces.
Reviewers: #kwin, davidedmundson
Reviewed By: #kwin, davidedmundson
Subscribers: davidedmundson, romangg, kwin
Tags: #kwin
Maniphest Tasks: T10867
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D24462
